NR 576 Week 7 Assignment; Clinical Practice Guidelines Peer Review

Peer Review Template Excellent Very Good Sa琀椀sfactory Needs Unsa琀椀sfactory Peer Reviewer: [Cameron Macchia] Improvement 100% 91% 83% 50% 0% Presenter: [Felicha Morris] 15 Points 14 Points 12 Points 8 Points 0 Points REVIEWER COMMENTS Applicability in All 4 cri琀椀cal All 4 cri琀椀cal 3 cri琀椀cal 2 cri琀椀cal 1 or less cri琀椀cal Primary Care elements are elements elements are elements are elements are The student: present and are present present. present. present. 1. Iden琀椀昀椀es the complete. but some author, organiza琀椀on informa琀椀on or group that may be only developed the CPG par琀椀ally 2. Student denotes addressed the year of the or original guideline inaccurate. The presenter included the required publica琀椀on informa琀椀on regarding the year of the 3. Student iden琀椀昀椀es original guideline publica琀椀on, which in this any subsequent case was 1988. Recent publica琀椀on revisions revisions (student’s were also included, which most recently was reference should be in December of 2020. The presenter also the most recent iden琀椀昀椀ed the organiza琀椀on for which the CPG version), and was developed, ADA. The applicability of the 4. Student discusses CPG in a primary care se琀��ng was not clearly the applicability for stated and was a general depic琀椀on of the use of this CPG in the goals of treatment. primary care se琀��ng (4 cri琀椀cal elements) Peer Review Template Excellent Very Good Sa琀椀sfactory Needs Unsa琀椀sfactory Peer Reviewer: [Cameron Macchia] Improvement 100% 91% 83% 50% 0% Presenter: [Felicha Morris] 30 Points 26 Points 24 Points 12 Points 0 Points REVIEWER COMMENTS Applica琀椀on in All 3 cri琀椀cal All 3 cri琀椀cal 2 cri琀椀cal 1 cri琀椀cal 0 cri琀椀cal Clinical elements are elements elements are elements are elements are 1. Using an example present and are present present. present. present. of a pa琀椀ent from complete. but some their clinical rota琀椀on informa琀椀on with the same may be only condi琀椀on par琀椀ally 2. Student discusses addressed The iden琀椀昀椀ed clinical example met the topic how the diagnosis or of the assigned CPG. The presenter was able and treatment of inaccurate. to re昀氀ect on the clinical recommenda琀椀ons their pa琀椀ent of the encounter, adhering to the ADA compared to the model guidelines. The presenter was able to recommenda琀椀ons iden琀椀fy what went well during the given in the encounter. Further informa琀椀on could have guidelines been provided regarding poten琀椀al 3. Speci昀椀c examples improvements. The diet was alluded to, but of what was done more informa琀椀on could have been provided well or what could to how the diet could have been improved have been done to allow for more diabe琀椀c control. be琀琀er is noted (3 cri琀椀cal elements) Assignment Content Subtotal 85 of 90 Points Assignment Format Excellent Very Good Sa琀椀sfactory Needs Unsa琀椀sfactory Peer Reviewer: [Cameron Macchia] A昀琀er reviewing the respected CPG ar琀椀cle regarding standards of medical care in diabetes it was determined that three clinical prac琀椀ce recommenda琀椀ons could be implemented into my own clinical prac琀椀ce to improve pa琀椀ent outcomes. These clinical guidelines include screening, appropriate referral, and therapeu琀椀c ac琀椀ons. In combina琀椀on these can favorably a昀昀ect health outcomes of pa琀椀ents with diabetes. In regards to screening, the ADA recommends universal screening for prediabetes and diabetes,