🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦

PHIL 347 Week 1 Discussion; Wisdom vs Knowledge.

Chamberlain University Philosophy PHIL 347 Critical Reasoning Patrick Charles 3 pages
View Full Course

Document Preview

Unlock Full 3 Page Document Instantly.

Document Overview

PHIL 347 Week 1 Discussion: Wisdom vs. Knowledge Required ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 1, 2, 3 Lesson Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook) IntroductionIn 2012, Psychologist Heather Butler studied the importance that critical thinking plays in our everyday lives. "Critical thinking is not just the new buzzword in education. Critical thinking involves real outcomes that can be measured, predicted, and—perhaps for the negative life events—avoided" (Butler, 2012, p. 725). In 2013, studies by Grossmann, Varnum, Kitayama, and Nisbett concluded that wise reasoning, rather than intelligence, was a predictor of well-being. In 2017, Dr. Butler and her colleagues, referencing the Grossmann study and based on their own research, determined that the ability to think critically was a better predictor of effective life decisions than was intelligence (Butler, Pentoney, & Bong, 2017). Initial Post Instructions For the initial post, address the following: Do you agree that wisdom/critical thinking is a better predictor of well-being than intelligence? To answer, you will have to define what the following terms mean for you: Critical thinking Wisdom Intelligence Well-being Reflect on what you read in the text this week. Think of the people you know. Are the good people smart? Are the smart people good? How do you define "good"? How do you define "smart"? Can we use our intelligence to become "good"? If yes, how? If no, whynot? Discussion: Week One The submissions for this assignment are posts in the assignment's discussion. Below are the discussion posts for Nursing Student, or you can view the full discussion. from Week 1 Discussion: Wisdom vs. KnowledgeHello Professor and Class, Do you agree that wisdom/critical thinking is a better predictor of well-being than intelligence? To answer, you will have to define what the following terms mean for you: Critical Thinking: the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment. Wisdom the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment.” Intelligence: the ability to acquire, learn and apply knowledge and skills. Well-being: the state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy. I agree that wisdom/critical thinking is a better predictor of well-being than intelligence.  According to the text “critical thinking uses reason to decide what to do and what to believe” (Jackson & Newberry, 2016). To be able to think critically, one has to conceptualize, analyze, gather information, and reflect upon that information to then communicate effectively and put thinking into action. Critical thinking is the ability to problem-solve and to use conflict resolution for a positive outcome for all parties involved. Intelligence is a certain degree of knowledge, collecting information, and applying knowledge to skills. Are the good people smart? There are good people in this world that do not make the smartest decisions. I know people who are so good that they will put other things and people before himself which is a heart-felt quality, but it always is a detrime

Full content available after purchase or with an active subscription.

Related Products

PHIL 347 Course Project; Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants

PHIL 347 Course Project; Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Course Project; Topic Selection.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Course Project; Topic Selection.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Introductory Discussion

PHIL 347 Week 1 Introductory Discussion

PHIL 347 Week 2 Assignment; Journal; Context, Meaning, and Value

PHIL 347 Week 2 Assignment; Journal; Context, Meaning, and Value

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz.

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz.

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion including Replies; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion including Replies; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 1; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 1; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 2; Context, Meaning, and Value - Indiana University Thomas Hart Benton Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 2; Context, Meaning, and Value - Indiana University Thomas Hart Benton Mural

PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 3 Course Project; Issue Review

PHIL 347 Week 3 Course Project; Issue Review

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources

PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment; Journal; Inference, Fallacies, Civic Responsibility

PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment; Journal; Inference, Fallacies, Civic Responsibility

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Spring Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Spring Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Summer Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Summer Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion including Responses; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion including Responses; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment; Journal

PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment; Journal

PHIL 347 Week 5 Course Project; Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation

PHIL 347 Week 5 Course Project; Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation

PHIL 347 Week 5 Discussion; In My Opinion

PHIL 347 Week 5 Discussion; In My Opinion

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 1 and Responses; Comparative Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 1 and Responses; Comparative Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 and Responses; Empirical Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 and Responses; Empirical Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Guided Learning Activity Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability

PHIL 347 Week 6 Guided Learning Activity Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability

PHIL 347 Week 7 Course Project; Argumentative Paper

PHIL 347 Week 7 Course Project; Argumentative Paper

PHIL 347 Week 7 Discussion and Responses; What Do I Value

PHIL 347 Week 7 Discussion and Responses; What Do I Value

PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment; Journal; Ethical Decision Making

PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment; Journal; Ethical Decision Making

PHIL 347 Week 8 Discussion including Responses; When the People You Love Dont Think Like You

PHIL 347 Week 8 Discussion including Responses; When the People You Love Dont Think Like You

Academic Use Notice: This resource is provided strictly as study support material to help students review concepts, understand topic structure, and prepare their own original academic work responsibly. It is not intended to be submitted directly as a student's own work.