PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 1 and Responses; Comparative Reasoning
Document Preview
Unlock Full 3 Page Document Instantly.
Document Overview
Week 6 Discussion 1: Comparative Reasoning: Follow-ups Initial Post Instructions For the initial post, research the history of the association of doctors with tobacco companies and tobacco advertising. Read about the association of doctors with the opioid crisis. Then, address the following: In what way are the two situations comparable? In what way are they different? Apply the concept of moral equivalence. Is the conduct of doctors in relation to smoking and the tobacco industry morally equivalent to the conduct of doctors in the opioid crisis? Explain your position and be very specific. Follow-Up Post Instructions Respond to at least one peer. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification. The submissions for this assignment are posts in the assignment's discussion. Below are the discussion posts for Nursing Student, or you can view the full discussion. from Week 6 Discussion 1: Comparative ReasoningHello Class! Medical professionals association with the tobacco industry and the opioid industry are comparable in several ways. The tobacco industry used doctors as a poster child to push their product while also downplaying the harmful effects of their product such as the cigarette brand Camel that advertised “more doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette” (Gardner). The Opioid industry uses similar tactics as big tobacco such as “falsely claim unfettered health benefits for the product, deny addicting, habituating or unhealthful properties; pay pain-specialists to shill for them.” (Hagan). Doctors are the ones we rely on to form our opinion on health because we automatically assume them to be credible since they’ve gone through years of med-school and we trust them with our personal health. These industries used the trust we have in our doctors to promote their product. Although these products have been marketed similarly, there is a difference between how they are sold. Cigarettes and tobacco were legally sold to any American with no regulation and thus everyone had access to it. On the other hand, opioids need to be prescribed by a Doct
Full content available after purchase or with an active subscription.
Related Products
Related Products
PHIL 347 Course Project; Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants
PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking
PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking.
PHIL 347 Week 1 Course Project; Topic Selection.
PHIL 347 Week 1 Discussion; Wisdom vs Knowledge.
PHIL 347 Week 1 Introductory Discussion
PHIL 347 Week 2 Assignment; Journal; Context, Meaning, and Value
PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz
PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz.
PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion including Replies; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural
PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 1; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural
PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 2; Context, Meaning, and Value - Indiana University Thomas Hart Benton Mural
PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz
PHIL 347 Week 3 Course Project; Issue Review
PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources
PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment; Journal; Inference, Fallacies, Civic Responsibility
PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Spring Semester
PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Summer Semester
PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion including Responses; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment; Journal
PHIL 347 Week 5 Course Project; Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation
PHIL 347 Week 5 Discussion; In My Opinion
PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz
PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 and Responses; Empirical Reasoning
PHIL 347 Week 6 Guided Learning Activity Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability
PHIL 347 Week 7 Course Project; Argumentative Paper
PHIL 347 Week 7 Discussion and Responses; What Do I Value
PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment; Journal; Ethical Decision Making
PHIL 347 Week 8 Discussion including Responses; When the People You Love Dont Think Like You
Academic Use Notice: This resource is provided strictly as study support material to help students review concepts, understand topic structure, and prepare their own original academic work responsibly. It is not intended to be submitted directly as a student's own work.