🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦ 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads ✦ Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks ✦ Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free ✦

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Spring Semester

Chamberlain University Philosophy PHIL 347 Critical Reasoning Patrick Charles 7 pages
View Full Course

Document Preview

Unlock Full 7 Page Document Instantly.

Document Overview

Check Point Quiz week 4 Instructions Required ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 8, 9 Lesson InstructionsThe checkpoint quizzes are short assessments that will check your understanding of the terms and concepts from the reading. Score for this quiz: 50 out of 50 Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words.  A deductive argument is a sound argument that shows a logical relationship between two premises that lead to or infer a conclusion. Deductive reason allows for certainty as long as certain rules are followed. Beginning with a statement we believe to be true or false. This is called the premise. Followed by reasoning in a logical manner to arrive at a conclusion. Go to the box “Deductive Reasoning” (in the beginning of Chapter 8). Read the last paragraph there. Based on that reading and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding, describe the part that “rules, operating conditions, core beliefs, values, policies, principles, procedures, and terminology” (p. 159) play in deductive arguments. These are things that set the foundation, guideline, or structure of our evaluative reasoning skill. Which allow us to determine the credibility and validity of claims made and sources of information. We also use these skills to determine strength or weaknesses of an argument. They help identify the elements of a situation and determine how those parts interact. In the introduction to Chapter 8, the text sets forth a specific definition of the term “valid” as it applies to deductive arguments. What is that definition? Your Answer: Valid- Describes an argument or inference such that the truth of the premise entails or implies that conclusion must be true; In other words, It impossible for the conclusion to be false if all of the premises are true. Use the following template to create a valid Denying the Consequent argument example:  If_________________ then _______________ It is not the case that ______________________ Therefore, it is not the case that ________________ Your Answer: If: You are an attorney then: you have completed law school if it is not the case: if you have not completed law school then you are not an attorney. Use the following template to create a valid Affirming the Antecedent argument example:  If_______________ then____________ ________________________________ Therefore _______________________ Your Answer: If: Amazon sells them cheaper than the Department stores Then: we will purchase them from Amazon The price quote from Amazon was cheaper than the price quote from the Department store   Jack says: “I can enroll full time this semester, or I can buy a car. I think going to school full time is the better option for me, so I’ll have to put off buying car.” What name does the text give to this argument structure? Your Answer: Disjunctive syllogism In addition to if/then and either/or, there are other terms that, when used correctly, can

Full content available after purchase or with an active subscription.

Related Products

PHIL 347 Course Project; Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants

PHIL 347 Course Project; Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Course Project; Topic Selection.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Course Project; Topic Selection.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Discussion; Wisdom vs Knowledge.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Discussion; Wisdom vs Knowledge.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Introductory Discussion

PHIL 347 Week 1 Introductory Discussion

PHIL 347 Week 2 Assignment; Journal; Context, Meaning, and Value

PHIL 347 Week 2 Assignment; Journal; Context, Meaning, and Value

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz.

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz.

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion including Replies; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion including Replies; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 1; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 1; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 2; Context, Meaning, and Value - Indiana University Thomas Hart Benton Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 2; Context, Meaning, and Value - Indiana University Thomas Hart Benton Mural

PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 3 Course Project; Issue Review

PHIL 347 Week 3 Course Project; Issue Review

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources

PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment; Journal; Inference, Fallacies, Civic Responsibility

PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment; Journal; Inference, Fallacies, Civic Responsibility

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Summer Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Summer Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion including Responses; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion including Responses; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment; Journal

PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment; Journal

PHIL 347 Week 5 Course Project; Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation

PHIL 347 Week 5 Course Project; Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation

PHIL 347 Week 5 Discussion; In My Opinion

PHIL 347 Week 5 Discussion; In My Opinion

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 1 and Responses; Comparative Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 1 and Responses; Comparative Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 and Responses; Empirical Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 and Responses; Empirical Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Guided Learning Activity Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability

PHIL 347 Week 6 Guided Learning Activity Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability

PHIL 347 Week 7 Course Project; Argumentative Paper

PHIL 347 Week 7 Course Project; Argumentative Paper

PHIL 347 Week 7 Discussion and Responses; What Do I Value

PHIL 347 Week 7 Discussion and Responses; What Do I Value

PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment; Journal; Ethical Decision Making

PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment; Journal; Ethical Decision Making

PHIL 347 Week 8 Discussion including Responses; When the People You Love Dont Think Like You

PHIL 347 Week 8 Discussion including Responses; When the People You Love Dont Think Like You

Academic Use Notice: This resource is provided strictly as study support material to help students review concepts, understand topic structure, and prepare their own original academic work responsibly. It is not intended to be submitted directly as a student's own work.