🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free 🎁 Contribute Documents & Earn Free Downloads Upload your notes, past papers & textbooks Share knowledge · Unlock resources for free

PHIL 347 Week 6 Guided Learning Activity Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability

Chamberlain University Philosophy PHIL 347 Critical Reasoning Patrick Charles 7 pages
View Full Course

Document Preview

Unlock Full 7 Page Document Instantly.

Document Overview

d. D e. E Question 4: Which line presents skepticism toward the expert’s conclusions? a. A b. B c. C d. D e. E Question 5: Which line provides supporting evidence for the researcher’s credibility? a. A b. B c. C d. D e. E Section 2: Finding Reliable Sources. Again, since we cannot research everything for ourselves, we need to be able to find sources that we trust to give us good information most of the time. That doesn’t mean sources that we agree with all the time. In fact, if we do agree with our sources all the time, it might be a bad sign. Discerning reliability is a great way to ensure you have good information at your disposal. Read pages 350-54 Passage 2: Source Evaluation in Journalism [A]An online news article reports on a groundbreaking medical discovery. [B] The article is written by a journalist with no scientific background and does not include citations from peer-reviewed studies. [C] Some experts criticize the article for misrepresenting the research findings. [D] The journalist claims to have interviewed multiple scientists, but direct quotes from researchers are missing. [E] Readers question the article’s reliability and look for alternative sources with stronger credibility. Question 6: Which line describes a weakness in the article’s credibility? a. A b. B c. C d. D Section 3: Identifying Bias and Evaluating Arguments While it is good to rely on peer-reviewed journals, especially if you are writing about research into healthcare or medical topics, not all topics can be supported solely by peer-reviewed journals. Another source is scholarly publications or websites published or sponsored by institutions that generate public policy research, analysis, and activity. These sites are affiliated with universities, governments, advocacy groups, foundations, and non-governmental organizations. Government websites, which use a .gov extension, can be trusted sources. Universities, which use the .edu extension, may or may not be authoritative, since individual employees of universities, faculty, and others may publish on the web using the .edu extension, but they do not necessarily speak for the university. Privately-owned pages from faculty or students might contain inaccurate information. Read pages 350-354 before answering the questions below. Passage 3: Political Commentary and Bias [A] A columnist argues that a proposed economic policy will lead to significant job losses. [B] The columnist cites studies from think tanks known for advocating a specific political ideology. [C] Some critics question whether the columnist selected studies that align with their personal views while ignoring opposing evidence. [D] The article is widely shared on social media, sparking heated debates. [E] Fact- checkers later find that the columnist misrepresented key statistics to support their argument. Question 11: Which line presents a counterargument to the columnist’s claims? a. A b. B c. C d. D e. E means APA citation style. This workbook will give you some tips on proper citation, but learning proper citation is your responsibility. The Chamberlain Library has excellent tutorials on this, and you can also go to APA’s own website,

Full content available after purchase or with an active subscription.

Related Products

PHIL 347 Course Project; Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants

PHIL 347 Course Project; Pathway to Citizenship for Undocumented Immigrants

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Assignment; Journal; Critical Thinking.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Course Project; Topic Selection.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Course Project; Topic Selection.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Discussion; Wisdom vs Knowledge.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Discussion; Wisdom vs Knowledge.

PHIL 347 Week 1 Introductory Discussion

PHIL 347 Week 1 Introductory Discussion

PHIL 347 Week 2 Assignment; Journal; Context, Meaning, and Value

PHIL 347 Week 2 Assignment; Journal; Context, Meaning, and Value

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz.

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz.

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion including Replies; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion including Replies; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 1; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 1; Context, Meaning, and Value - California Washington Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 2; Context, Meaning, and Value - Indiana University Thomas Hart Benton Mural

PHIL 347 Week 2 Discussion Option 2; Context, Meaning, and Value - Indiana University Thomas Hart Benton Mural

PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 3 Course Project; Issue Review

PHIL 347 Week 3 Course Project; Issue Review

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources

PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment; Journal; Inference, Fallacies, Civic Responsibility

PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment; Journal; Inference, Fallacies, Civic Responsibility

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Spring Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Spring Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Summer Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz - Summer Semester

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion including Responses; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion including Responses; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment; Journal

PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment; Journal

PHIL 347 Week 5 Course Project; Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation

PHIL 347 Week 5 Course Project; Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation

PHIL 347 Week 5 Discussion; In My Opinion

PHIL 347 Week 5 Discussion; In My Opinion

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint Quiz

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 1 and Responses; Comparative Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 1 and Responses; Comparative Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 and Responses; Empirical Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2 and Responses; Empirical Reasoning

PHIL 347 Week 7 Course Project; Argumentative Paper

PHIL 347 Week 7 Course Project; Argumentative Paper

PHIL 347 Week 7 Discussion and Responses; What Do I Value

PHIL 347 Week 7 Discussion and Responses; What Do I Value

PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment; Journal; Ethical Decision Making

PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment; Journal; Ethical Decision Making

PHIL 347 Week 8 Discussion including Responses; When the People You Love Dont Think Like You

PHIL 347 Week 8 Discussion including Responses; When the People You Love Dont Think Like You

Academic Use Notice: This resource is provided strictly as study support material to help students review concepts, understand topic structure, and prepare their own original academic work responsibly. It is not intended to be submitted directly as a student's own work.